On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 1:35 PM, John Ralls <jra...@ceridwen.us> wrote: > One of the files in the new (to introspection) cmph directory, chd_ph.c, > includes an anonymous union which requires -std=gnu99 to compile. Is that OK?
This would have been better as a bug. However, if what you're *really* asking here is: * What's the gtk+/GNOME policy on compilers that we should build with? That would be a good subject for a list discussion =) What's the actual problem you ran into that caused you to make this post (hypothetical example: You are trying to build the stack with LLVM, and it doesn't support anonymous unions (it may actually, i'm just making this up)). Now, if we're trying to say that GTK+/GNOME only requires "C89", strictly speaking, we have work to do: $ metabuild CFLAGS='-Wall -std=c89' metabuild: logging to '/tmp/build-gtk3.log' metabuild: Detected Makefile, using it metabuild: Running: ['chrt', '--idle', '0', 'nice', 'ionice', '-c', '3', '-t', 'make', 'CFLAGS=-Wall -std=c89', '-j', '24'] make all-recursive make[1]: Entering directory `/src/checkout/gtk3' ... make[2]: Entering directory `/src/checkout/gtk3/gdk' make[3]: Entering directory `/src/checkout/gtk3/gdk' make[4]: Entering directory `/src/checkout/gtk3/gdk/win32' make[4]: `.gitignore' is up to date. make[4]: Leaving directory `/src/checkout/gtk3/gdk/win32' make[4]: Entering directory `/src/checkout/gtk3/gdk/quartz' make[4]: `.gitignore' is up to date. make[4]: Leaving directory `/src/checkout/gtk3/gdk/quartz' make[3]: Leaving directory `/src/checkout/gtk3/gdk' make all-recursive make[3]: Entering directory `/src/checkout/gtk3/gdk' Making all in x11 make[4]: Entering directory `/src/checkout/gtk3/gdk/x11' CC gdkapplaunchcontext-x11.lo CC gdkasync.lo CC gdkcursor-x11.lo CC gdkdevice-core.lo CC gdkdevicemanager-core.lo CC gdkdevicemanager-x11.lo CC gdkdisplay-x11.lo CC gdkdnd-x11.lo CC gdkeventsource.lo CC gdkgeometry-x11.lo CC gdkeventtranslator.lo CC gdkglobals-x11.lo CC gdkim-x11.lo CC gdkinput.lo CC gdkkeys-x11.lo CC gdkmain-x11.lo CC gdkproperty-x11.lo CC gdkscreen-x11.lo CC gdkselection-x11.lo CC gdkspawn-x11.lo CC gdktestutils-x11.lo CC gdkvisual-x11.lo CC gdkwindow-x11.lo CC gdkxftdefaults.lo CC gdkxid.lo CC checksettings.o checksettings.c: In function ‘main’: checksettings.c:43:7: error: expected expression before ‘/’ token make[4]: *** [checksettings.o] Error 1 make[4]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... make[4]: Leaving directory `/src/checkout/gtk3/gdk/x11' Now, obviously C++ comments in C files are pretty easy for other compilers to implement. But it's hard to know what other GNU C extensions the GTK+ stack uses with without fixing those. Are there any nested functions for example in GTK+? I'd be surprised, but you never know... The CMPH situation for g-i is special in a few ways because it's an import of sort-of-maintained code, and I really don't want to be in the business of diverging too far. I should probably invest in axing out a lot of the code that isn't used, but it's nontrivial. Bottom line here - if there's a use case you think should be supported, *explain what it is*, and let's discuss getting a buildbot set up. _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
