On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 8:43 PM, John Ralls <jra...@ceridwen.us> wrote: > > I wanted to know whether I should file a bug on cmph not compiling when I > feed it -std=c99 (almost everything else, > including gtk+, builds happily with c89, so no, it doesn't have nested > functions) or just change the gtk-osx jhbuild module to use gnu99.
Hmm, you referenced 3 different things here; c99, c89, and gnu99. Which do you mean? > I guess you answered the question, so I'll write a patch and file a bug... > but probably not till early next week, as we're releasing Gnucash 2.4.0 this > weekend and I've some work to do there first. Okay well, I *think* you answered my question, which is that you want the stack to build with "c99". > But since you bring it up, what is the "official" policy? Is it C89? Is it > published somewhere? I have no idea...I don't think it is written down anywhere. _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
