Hi Tristan,
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Tristan Van Berkom <t...@gnome.org> wrote: > The document above points to this list of icon names: > > http://standards.freedesktop.org/icon-naming-spec/icon-naming-spec-latest.html#names > > What guarantees do we have that referring to an icon name in the "icon > naming spec" will > actually produce an icon ? > > Will GTK+ have a dependency on an installed icon theme which conforms > to the basic spec ? > (can GTK+'s configure script verify that there is a *complete* set of > icons installed and bail > out if it's not the case ?). > Yeah that was advantage "1. A guaranteed, consistent, and high quality set of icons" I listed. Essentially GTK+ 3 has implicitly had a runtime dependency on an implementation of the icon naming spec for some time. This isn't a new change. In fact we optionally also depend on an implementation of symbolic icons too. Even though I think not having one should fallback in some fashion. As for the best way to express this? I don't know offhand. Suggestions welcome. Jon
_______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
