On Tue, 2013-10-08 at 08:58 -0400, Dan Winship wrote: > enchant depends on glib, so yes, a hard dependency on it from glib would > be a problem. But enchant development has more or less stopped (last > commit was two years ago), and if glib had equivalent functionality then > enchant would be pretty much unnecessary. So it might make more sense to > just absorb it into glib (which Dom seemed in favor of in that bug anyway).
Or perhaps follow the "glib-networking" pattern where GIO just defines a spell checking interface and an extension point and the meaty parts with the extra dependencies are supplied by 3rd party module(s). "glib-spell-checking" anyone? :) Matthew Barnes _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
