Hi; whether or not Chromium uses client-side decorations has no bearing as to GTK+ allowing them. The ability for application developers to control the decorations of the windows they use has been a long-standing request for GTK+; we've been talking about embedding widgets inside decorations even before Chrome was a thing.
Let's not side-track this discussion even further. Ciao, Emmanuele. On 24 March 2015 at 12:05, Pavel Machek <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > >> Besides, I don't think we should evaluate CSD in gtk+ based on >> Chromium implementation. > >> IIRC Chromium moved away from gtk+ in favor of aura [1]. > > I was aware Chromium is not gtk based -- at least it shows problem is > widespread. > > Evince has the same problem. But as atril is available, I tend to just > avoid evince. > > pavel@duo:~$ ldd `which evince` | grep gtk > libgtk-3.so.0 => /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0 > (0xb6e04000) > pavel@duo:~$ > Pavel > > -- > (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek > (cesky, pictures) > http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html > _______________________________________________ > gtk-devel-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list -- https://www.bassi.io [@] ebassi [@gmail.com] _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
