On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 12:06 PM <philip.chime...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:30 AM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <poch...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On 21/06/16 16:26, Peter Weber wrote: >> > I don't see here an active discussion about Gtk+4.0[1]? So I'm trying to >> > write about my thoughts, in a careful way. In the first moment, I >> thought >> > this is a good idea and just the numbering is misleading. Stability is >> what >> > developers want, we need it, we love it. With a few days distance, >> > numbering is just a small issue, I see this now entirely different and >> > three major issues: >> >> Here are some thoughts I have about all this, from a downstream >> maintainer POV. >> > > Thanks! It's good to get opinions from all over the place. >
And, speaking of that, there was a blog post [1] on the GTK 4 subject that recently got a lot of attention on Hacker News. I reached out to the author and encouraged them to give their opinion here, but it seems the message is stalled in the moderator queue. Is there a moderator who can help? [1] https://davmac.wordpress.com/2016/07/05/why-do-we-keep-building-rotten-foundations/ Regards, Philip C
_______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
