Sorry, there is no real change, I still have no time to work on broadway
"for real". I just spent a couple of days converting the broadway backend
to match the changes that are happening in gtk4 "for fun". Unfortunatelly
it just ended up with me and a huge todo-list and no more time to work on
it...

Maybe someone else is interested in consulting work on it though?

On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 6:13 AM, Daniel Kasak <d.j.kasak...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Alexander. I appreciate you clarifying this for us. It was a nice
> surprise to read on Phoronix recently that you're still committing fixes &
> improvements to the broadway codebase. I'd like to understand - has
> anything changed in the past year that's brought you back to broadway? I
> know there are still a handful of users around who would love to see this
> continue ( some of them email me directly, and I have to answer: "sorry -
> I'm just a user as well" ). If throwing money at the problem works, we
> might be able to arrange that, maybe via a crowdfunding page, or something
> less formal. Would it be worth it to you or Redhat?
>
> Dan
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 2:25 AM, Alexander Larsson <al...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On ons, 2016-12-07 at 14:18 +1100, Daniel Kasak wrote:
>> > Hi all.
>> >
>> > I posting here in response to comments on bug:
>> > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775680 ( summary: broadway
>> > support likely to be removed from Gtk+4.0 ).
>> >
>> > I think it would be a massive pity to drop broadway support from gtk.
>> > It's been a god-send for me and those I work with - it provides the
>> > best remote access to gtk apps and performs way better than vnc. I've
>> > actually been working on an authentication + transparent proxy for
>> > broadway, so multiple users can access multiple apps all via https on
>> > port 443: https://tesla.duckdns.org/transparent-proxy-for-broadway-gt
>> > k3-html5-backend/
>>
>> So, there are two issues with broadway.
>>
>> First of all, I wrote it mostly as a proof of concept of an interesting
>> idea. I have zero cycles to spend on it anymore, nor do any of the
>> other people who currently work on Gtk+. Its still there, because it
>> just works and is not really a burden on the existing code unless you
>> use it.
>>
>> Secondly, while it just keeps working in gtk3, the same is not true for
>> Gtk4. We're doing massive changes to the internals of the drawing
>> model, with the end goal of having a much more modern base targeting
>> how current GPU hardware works. This is very much not how broadway
>> works though, so there is some conflict here. For now, we have fallback
>> code for the rendering that keeps broadway working, so we're keeping it
>> around, but if at any point broadway becomes a problem to keep working
>> we're going to drop. I don't really forsee this happening at the
>> moment, but there are no guarantees.
>>
>> --
>> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>>  Alexander Larsson                                            Red Hat, Inc
>>        al...@redhat.com            alexander.lars...@gmail.com
>> He's a lonely bohemian shaman on his last day in the job. She's a
>> beautiful psychic schoolgirl looking for love in all the wrong places.
>> They fight crime!
>>
>
>


-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 Alexander Larsson                                Red Hat, Inc
       al...@redhat.com         alexander.lars...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list

Reply via email to