On 16 Feb 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> There was no functional change. This message was simply not shown
> before unless some debug level was sufficiently high. Just collect
> them and do a whois lookup. You can also dump the packets and run
> the log through barracuda to see what exactly they are sending.
Hmm... I remember that now. I did look to see. I was looking for
reasons that LimeWire leaves seem to have become more rare.
I downloaded the LimeWire source...
[limewire/core/com/limegroup/gnutella/handshaking/HandshakeResponse.java]
GOOD_ULTRAPEER = isHighDegreeConnection() &&
isUltrapeerQueryRoutingConnection() &&
(getMaxTTL() < 5) &&
isDynamicQueryConnection();
GOOD_LEAF = GOOD_ULTRAPEER && (IS_LIMEWIRE || NO_REQUERYING);
Apparently if you wish to connect to newer LimeWire nodes, you have to
use Properties|GnutellaNet and set Max TTL to 4... or run "set max_ttl
4" from the console.
Apparently most of the LimeWire nodes that connect with Max TTL > 4
are spammers, etc. [Or older versions which gtkg doesn't like].
Fwiw,
Bill Pringlemeir.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Gtk-gnutella-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtk-gnutella-devel
