[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > And of course, what we end up is an ISO-standard band-aid, with bells, > wistles, gauges, buttons, and supporting documentation, which still won't > fix the problem of programmers who don't take the time to write secure > code. > > You're probably better off sticking with the current code. ;) > We definitely would not include all that stuff to poke around in /etc; major overkill. If it's necessary, we'd just leave things as they are now. Havoc _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released Paul Davis
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released Havoc Pennington
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released J. Ali Harlow
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released Havoc Pennington
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released J. Ali Harlow
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released J. Ali Harlow
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released Havoc Pennington
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released Havoc Pennington
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released Nils Philippsen
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released J. Ali Harlow
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released Paul Davis
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released David Ford
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released Kevin Handy
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released J. Ali Harlow
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released J. Ali Harlow
- Re: GTK+-1.2.9 Released Dave Benson
