J. Ali Harlow wrote:
> In the meantime, we will be forced
> to ship stable versions that subvert your check if you refuse to provide a
> workaround. The code is already written and in place. The user will see
> nothing.
Wow, we could play a game here. Owen scores a point whenever he releases
GTK source (or a patch, just to make the cycle shorter) which makes GTK
unusable with the existing game binaries. You score a point whenever you
release source or a patch which will work setgid with the existing GTK
binaries. To make it more interesting, patches don't have to be portable,
ie. a single OS on a specific architecture counts.
And mere mortals can take whichever side they want, but they only may
select compiler, linker and assembler flags, without changing the sources.
> I would be delighted to delete it if 1.2.9 was the only version that
> needed it.
Why, 1.2.8 and earlier should also be in the game. :-)
--
.-. .-. Sarcasm is just one more service we offer.
(_ \ / _)
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
_______________________________________________
gtk-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
