configure complaines about sigc++ not being sane. If I disable the sigc++ test under configuration, gtk-- compiles, but the linker does not link against the sigc++ library. I tried both the version of sigc++ that comes with redhat 7.2 and the latest version that I compiled up myself (configured with ./configure --prefix=/usr).
When I downloaded binaries (rpm packages) however it worked perfectly (with the standard compiler for that system gcc version 2.9-somthing Maybe i have made something wrong, but I usually do not have troubles compiling things, and I've tried this resently on two different systems (SunOs and RH7.2). .David On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Paul Davis wrote: > >I have tried gtk--. This seems to be thought of as the standard c++ > >binding for gtk+. I cant tell if it is the best since it is the only one > >I've tried. The drawback is that it is difficult to install from source, > >so you have to get the binary packages. At least I havn't been able to > >install from source on any of the machines I've tried it on. > >I think it is easy to use, easier than gkt+. > > puzzling. i've never seen any mail from anyone on the gtkmm mailing > list who had problems with "./configure && make && make install". what > problems did you have? > > installing binary copies of C++ libraries is always a dubious > decision. C++ libraries are incompatible with an application if they > were compiled by different compilers and/or against different versions > of libraries that included lots of inline code. > > --p > _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
