[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > me again. Seems there are some nice solutions for C++ wrappers (for GTK+). > But that throws up the following question: > > What speaks against "leaving" GTK+ functions as they are and just write > a C++ program (without a wrapper)??? > > Maybe I sound plain stupid now, but, is there also a C wrapper for GTK+??? > I mean a wrapper that simplifies GTK+ function handling (without going > C++). >
vdk tool kit goes toward this way, instead wrapping each single one-to-one statement it hides in the background the tedious, time-consuming process to write gtk+ applications framework from the scratch, normal operations can be done using only vdk calls, for fancy things user should use gtk+ lower level calls. It's a C++ wrapper however, nothing against writing gtk+ apps in C, but using C++ you loose flexibility and OOP features, better plain C than an underused C++ (imho). To remain inti C field, there is Glade that greatly helps you in designing and developing interface. /mario > Thanks for your answers again. > With kindest regards, > RevX. > > -- =============================================== Mario Motta [AI Research Group - Rimini - Italy] http://vdkbuilder.sourceforge.net ================================================ _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
