Alex Graveley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Sun, 2002-01-06 at 18:18, Havoc Pennington wrote: > > Anyway, too late until 2.2. > > Argh. There's no way we can squish this in? It would have the exact > same API as the static version. >
I don't get why it's important? I've never used or much thought about this API, but as I said before, you allocate dynamic memory, put the static mutex in it, and presto a dynamic mutex. What's the issue? Havoc _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
