Apologies for the imprecise subject everyone - will remember for next time.

I've tried the various suggestions from David, for which many thanks, 
but saw no improvement. The outputs from the commands were as follows:

rpm --verify gtk2
No output or errors returned. Command returned code 0.

ldd /opt/openoffice.org2.1/program/soffice.bin | grep -v '=> 
/\(opt/gnome\|lib\|usr/lib\|usr/X11R6/lib\)'
         linux-gate.so.1 =>  (0xffffe000)
         libvcl680li.so => /opt/openoffice.org2.1/program/libvcl680li.so 
(0x40018000)
         libsvl680li.so => /opt/openoffice.org2.1/program/libsvl680li.so 
(0x40334000)
         libsvt680li.so => /opt/openoffice.org2.1/program/libsvt680li.so 
(0x4041a000)
         libutl680li.so => /opt/openoffice.org2.1/program/libutl680li.so 
(0x407c6000)
         libtl680li.so => /opt/openoffice.org2.1/program/libtl680li.so 
(0x40844000)
         libi18nisolang1gcc3.so => 
/opt/openoffice.org2.1/program/libi18nisolang1gcc3.so (0x408db000)
         libcomphelp4gcc3.so => 
/opt/openoffice.org2.1/program/libcomphelp4gcc3.so (0x408e1000)
         libucbhelper3gcc3.so => 
/opt/openoffice.org2.1/program/libucbhelper3gcc3.so (0x409c6000)
         libvos3gcc3.so => /opt/openoffice.org2.1/program/libvos3gcc3.so 
(0x40a37000)
         libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3 => 
/opt/openoffice.org2.1/program/libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3 (0x40a58000)
         libuno_cppu.so.3 => 
/opt/openoffice.org2.1/program/libuno_cppu.so.3 (0x40ab7000)
         libuno_sal.so.3 => 
/opt/openoffice.org2.1/program/libuno_sal.so.3 (0x40aed000)
         libtk680li.so => /opt/openoffice.org2.1/program/libtk680li.so 
(0x40ca6000)
         libstlport_gcc.so => 
/opt/openoffice.org2.1/program/libstlport_gcc.so (0x41007000)
         libstdc++.so.6 => /opt/openoffice.org2.1/program/libstdc++.so.6 
(0x410d5000)
         libgcc_s.so.1 => /opt/openoffice.org2.1/program/libgcc_s.so.1 
(0x411d0000)
         libsot680li.so => /opt/openoffice.org2.1/program/libsot680li.so 
(0x412f9000)
         libbasegfx680li.so => 
/opt/openoffice.org2.1/program/libbasegfx680li.so (0x4134a000)
         libicuuc.so.26 => /opt/openoffice.org2.1/program/libicuuc.so.26 
(0x413a4000)
         libicule.so.26 => /opt/openoffice.org2.1/program/libicule.so.26 
(0x41455000)
         libjvmaccessgcc3.so.3 => 
/opt/openoffice.org2.1/program/libjvmaccessgcc3.so.3 (0x4147e000)
         libjvmfwk.so.3 => /opt/openoffice.org2.1/program/libjvmfwk.so.3 
(0x414f0000)
         libuno_salhelpergcc3.so.3 => 
/opt/openoffice.org2.1/program/libuno_salhelpergcc3.so.3 (0x4150c000)
         /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)
         libicudata.so.26 => 
/opt/openoffice.org2.1/program/libicudata.so.26 (0x41511000)
         libxml2.so.2 => /opt/openoffice.org2.1/program/libxml2.so.2 
(0x418cf000)
Is this showing errors? I don't know. What output should I expect from 
this command?

/sbin/conf.d/SuSEconfig.gtk2
No output or error returned. Command returned code 0

I still get the pixbuf errors. However, I cannot see any associated 
problems when using the various applications - they all appear to be 
running correctly.

Sorry if I'm appearing obtuse or missing something obvious here, but I'm 
definitely not a programmer and don't really understand how GTK fits 
into the Gnome/Application structure. For example, do I still need any 
GTK1 files if I have GTK2 installed? Would having both installed cause 
problems?

Any help or pointers very welcome,
Thanks





David Nečas (Yeti) wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 07:02:46PM +0000, Purbeck Consultancy wrote:
>> Folks, I notice with my applications that I am getting endless instances
>> of the following errors:
>> GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_get_height: assertion `pixbuf != NULL'
>> failed
>> GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_get_width: assertion `pixbuf != NULL'
>> failed
>>
>> These are with all apps, including nautilus and Pan.
>>
>> I have absolutely no idea what is causing them, but I'd really like to
>> fix it!
>>
>> Suse 10.0 - patched current. Gnome 2.12
>> gtk2-2.8.3-4.3
> 
> This is not the current version, a fully patched SuSE 10.0
> should have gtk2-2.8.3-4.7.  I don't know whether it's
> relevant.
> 
>> Not sure what other info to post - please advise, and if anyone knows
>> what this error is I'd be very interested!
> 
> For some reason Gtk+ seem to have lost the ability to load
> icons.
> 
> I suppose you did not fiddle with your installation
> recently.  Anyway, try
> 
>   rpm --verify gtk2
> 
> to check the Gtk+ installation against the rpm database
> and
> 
>   ldd SOME-GTK-APP | grep -v '=> /\(opt/gnome\|lib\|usr/lib\|usr/X11R6/lib\)'
> 
> to see whether any libs are loaded from unexpected places.
> 
> You can also try (as root)
> 
>   touch /var/adm/SuSEconfig/run-gtk
>   /sbin/conf.d/SuSEconfig.gtk
> 
> to re-generate all Gtk+-related cached (including of pixbuf
> loaders).
> 
> Yeti
> 
> 
> P.S.: Next time please give your post a meaningful subject.
> 
> 
> --
> Whatever.
> _______________________________________________
> gtk-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
> 

-- 
Jeremy Morris
IT Consultant
Purbeck Consultancy Ltd
Tel: 01202 575315
Mob: 07867 807284
_______________________________________________
gtk-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list

Reply via email to