David Nečas (Yeti) wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 12:02:33AM +0000, Purbeck Consultancy wrote:
>> ldd /opt/openoffice.org2.1/program/soffice.bin | grep -v '=>
>> /\(opt/gnome\|lib\|usr/lib\|usr/X11R6/lib\)'
>> ...
>> Is this showing errors? I don't know. What output should I expect from
>> this command?
>
> If run on something else than a monster like OpenOffice
> (moreover evidently not installed from SuSE package so
> possibly coming with its own set of problems), it should
> print only the ld-linux line. Please try these things on
> something simple and predictable, e.g. gtk-demo. But the
> other libs are `expected' too in this case.
OK, here is the output from ldd /opt/gnome/bin/gtk-demo | grep -v '=>
/\(opt/gnome\|lib\|usr/lib\|usr/X11R6/lib\)'
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xffffe000)
libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 => /opt/gnome/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0
(0x4002c000)
libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 => /opt/gnome/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 (0x40043000)
libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 => /opt/gnome/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
(0x400c5000)
libXrandr.so.2 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrandr.so.2 (0x403b8000)
libXi.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXi.so.6 (0x403bc000)
libXinerama.so.1 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXinerama.so.1 (0x403c4000)
libXcursor.so.1 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXcursor.so.1 (0x403c7000)
libXfixes.so.3 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXfixes.so.3 (0x403d1000)
libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 => /opt/gnome/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0
(0x403d6000)
libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 => /opt/gnome/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 (0x403dd000)
libpango-1.0.so.0 => /opt/gnome/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0 (0x40402000)
libatk-1.0.so.0 => /opt/gnome/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0 (0x4043a000)
libgobject-2.0.so.0 => /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
(0x40453000)
libgmodule-2.0.so.0 => /opt/gnome/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0
(0x4048e000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x40491000)
libglib-2.0.so.0 => /opt/gnome/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 (0x40495000)
libcairo.so.2 => /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2 (0x4051d000)
libfontconfig.so.1 => /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 (0x4056a000)
libfreetype.so.6 => /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (0x4059a000)
libexpat.so.0 => /usr/lib/libexpat.so.0 (0x40609000)
libXrender.so.1 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXrender.so.1 (0x40629000)
libX11.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x40631000)
libXext.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x4072a000)
libpng12.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 (0x40738000)
libz.so.1 => /lib/libz.so.1 (0x40777000)
libglitz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libglitz.so.1 (0x4078b000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/libm.so.6 (0x407af000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x407d5000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)
>
>> I still get the pixbuf errors. However, I cannot see any associated
>> problems when using the various applications - they all appear to be
>> running correctly.
>
> So all the icons/images are displayed normally?
>
As far as I am able to tell, yes. Nothing appears to be missing.
> Then you have to make it crash and print the backtrace, as
> suggested.
Will try but not sure how to generate a backtrace, although I have
installed the gtk-debuginfo packages and can run gtk-demo with the
--g-fatal-warnings arg, and crash it by running the Menus demo and
selecting Flip.
>
>> Sorry if I'm appearing obtuse or missing something obvious here, but I'm
>> definitely not a programmer and don't really understand how GTK fits
>> into the Gnome/Application structure.
>
> Gtk+ is a library -- one that essentially all Gnome programs
> use because it provides the user interface widget toolkit.
>
>> For example, do I still need any
>> GTK1 files if I have GTK2 installed?
>
> No.
>
>> Would having both installed cause
>> problems?
>
> No.
>
Thanks very much.
> Yeti
>
>
> --
> Whatever.
> _______________________________________________
> gtk-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
>
--
Jeremy Morris
IT Consultant
Purbeck Consultancy Ltd
Tel: 01202 575315
Mob: 07867 807284
_______________________________________________
gtk-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
