----- Original Message -----
> From: Gour <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Cc:
> Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 7:40 PM
> Subject: Re: future of development for the desktop
>
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 09:22:55 -0700 (PDT)
> Sergei Steshenko <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Nowadays there is QML (
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QML ) and in my opinion, though I do not
>> know Javascript, it can be compared to Perl (e.g. closures are
>> present), so today I'd probably choose Qt + QML.
>
> "QML is mainly used for mobile applications where touch input, fluid
> animations (60 FPS) and user experience are crucial."
>
>
> Sincerely,
> Gour
>
I didn't read the whole QML documentation, but I don't think that QML can not
be used without animations and that it cannot be used with traditional input
from mouse and keyboard.
I.e. my understanding of QML is that it's JavaScript-like language Qt binding
with additional capabilities like GUI creation from description and the
features you've mentioned.
...
Still, since we are discussing bare-naked gtk+, I am re-asking my question: in
what aspects gtk+ is better than Qt ? Especially, since we already know it
(used to be ? still is ?) slower tan Qt.
Regards,
Sergei.
_______________________________________________
gtk-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
