On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Enrico Weigelt <[email protected]> wrote:
> * Paul Davis <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Well, AFAIK, gtk had become much more dynamic than its older > > versions. > > Maybe that's the problem: too many dynamic (heap) allocations, > > lookups, etc, etc. > > hmm, what could we possibly do about it ? > > > > measuring it would be a good first step. > > Sure. But, unfortunately, it's not trivial to set up some useful > test cases without actually implementing my suggested approach > in several applications first. > you made a fairly strong claim: that "too many dynamic (heap) allocations" are involved in slowing down GTK3, either w.r.t. GTK2 and/or w.r.t. other toolkits. that seems like a fairly easy thing to test.
_______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
