----- Original Message -----
> From: Jasper St. Pierre <[email protected]>
> To: Sergei Steshenko <[email protected]>
> Cc: Kevin Anthony <[email protected]>; "[email protected]"
> <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 8:12 PM
> Subject: Re: future of development for the desktop
>
> Ah, OK, you're basing the results on GTK+ 3.0. There were a few bugs
> in GTK+ 3.0 (that were fixed in subsequent releases), and a lot of
> widgets didn't really like the width-for-height allocation model,
> tempting the layout to do double the work. A lot of widgets have been
> fixed, and Company has also put some time into making GtkTreeView
> faster. I'm not sure where he is with that.
>
Is gtk+ 3.*.* now faster than the latest gtk+-2.*.* ?
If not, since even gtk+-2.*.* is slower than Qt, gtk+ loses.
...
Here is another thread:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1887070/what-should-i-choose-gtk-or-qt .
FWIW, Qt now also is LGPL.
I really want to hear from gtk+ "gods" - I've asked the question about gtk+
over Qt advantages, but have never seen an answer.
Regards,
Sergei.
_______________________________________________
gtk-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
