On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 08:31:49PM -0400, Deborah Swayne wrote: > > Instead of using an idle function, make your function myidle() a > > timeout with a very short delay (say 30 or 40ms), while increasing > > your step size. > > I'll try Jon's suggestion above; I'm not proud. But I'm puzzled. > Why should gtk be so much slower than X? And sure enough, the timeout method has the best performance of the three. Thanks, Jon. Debby -- To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
- [gtk-list] X and idles => incredible slowdowns Antonio Campos
- [gtk-list] Re: X and idles => incredible slowdow... Havoc Pennington
- [gtk-list] Re: X and idles => incredible slo... Antonio Campos
- [gtk-list] Re: X and idles => incredible... Havoc Pennington
- [gtk-list] Re: X and idles => incred... Jon Trowbridge
- [gtk-list] Re: X and idles => i... Deborah Swayne
- [gtk-list] Re: X and idles =&g... Deborah Swayne
- [gtk-list] Re: X and idles =&g... Timothy M. Shead
- [gtk-list] Re: X and idles... Deborah Swayne
- [gtk-list] Re: X and idles... Timothy M. Shead
- [gtk-list] Re: X and idles... Paul Barton-Davis
- [gtk-list] Re: X and idles =&g... Havoc Pennington
- [gtk-list] Re: X and idles => incredible slowdow... Paul Barton-Davis
- [gtk-list] Re: X and idles => incredible slo... Antonio Campos
- [gtk-list] Re: X and idles => incredible... Jon Trowbridge
- [gtk-list] Re: X and idles => incred... Antonio Campos
- [gtk-list] Re: X and idles => i... Jon Trowbridge