Deborah Swayne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'll try Jon's suggestion above; I'm not proud. But I'm puzzled. > Why should gtk be so much slower than X? > I don't think this could be a speed problem; consider that the idle loop method was faster, and it should have more overhead/bottlenecks than the threaded approach. Also, GTK certainly should not be significantly slower than X, look at the implementation of GDK and you'll see there's nothing there that would be slow. I would guess there's just some structural problem, such as threads getting stuck waiting for locks, or the like. Havoc -- To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
- [gtk-list] Re: X and idles => incredible slowdowns Havoc Pennington
- [gtk-list] Re: X and idles => incredible slowdo... Antonio Campos
- [gtk-list] Re: X and idles => incredible sl... Havoc Pennington
- [gtk-list] Re: X and idles => incredibl... Jon Trowbridge
- [gtk-list] Re: X and idles => incre... Deborah Swayne
- [gtk-list] Re: X and idles => ... Deborah Swayne
- [gtk-list] Re: X and idles => ... Timothy M. Shead
- [gtk-list] Re: X and idles =&... Deborah Swayne
- [gtk-list] Re: X and idles =&... Timothy M. Shead
- [gtk-list] Re: X and idles =&... Paul Barton-Davis
- [gtk-list] Re: X and idles => ... Havoc Pennington
- [gtk-list] Re: X and idles => incredible slowdowns Paul Barton-Davis
- [gtk-list] Re: X and idles => incredible slowdo... Antonio Campos
- [gtk-list] Re: X and idles => incredible sl... Jon Trowbridge
- [gtk-list] Re: X and idles => incredibl... Antonio Campos
- [gtk-list] Re: X and idles => incre... Jon Trowbridge
- [gtk-list] Re: X and idles => ... Paul Barton-Davis
- [gtk-list] Re: X and idles => incredible sl... Paul Barton-Davis
- [gtk-list] Re: X and idles => incredibl... Antonio Campos
- [gtk-list] Re: X and idles => incre... Valdis . Kletnieks