On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 13:45 -0500, Jonathon Jongsma wrote: > I don't really understand the need to pass the found_items parameter > to the child items in the first place. Why does the child item need > to know which of its parent items were already found at the given > coordinate? In my opinion, it would be better just to leave that > parameter out, and just return a GList* of items found at your level > or below, Then the parent would be responsible for combining these all > together and returning that to its parent. Or maybe a totally > different approach would be better...
If that's possible, that would seem simpler. Could you ask on the goocanvas list? -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
