On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 21:50 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote: > On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 13:45 -0500, Jonathon Jongsma wrote: > > I don't really understand the need to pass the found_items parameter > > to the child items in the first place. Why does the child item need > > to know which of its parent items were already found at the given > > coordinate? In my opinion, it would be better just to leave that > > parameter out, and just return a GList* of items found at your level > > or below, Then the parent would be responsible for combining these all > > together and returning that to its parent. Or maybe a totally > > different approach would be better... > > If that's possible, that would seem simpler. Could you ask on the > goocanvas list? >
Yes, I should, I just haven't gotten around to it yet. I will try to write up something comprehensible soon. it would be much easier if goocanvas was hosted on gnome servers so I could just file a bug in bugzilla... -- Jonner _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
