I vote for std::vector. I keep trying to use std::list in my project but the need for random access to the elements keeps pushing me back to vector.
</my two cents> Dustin On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Murray Cumming <[email protected]> wrote: > In gtkmm 3.0, I'd like to remove the intermediate container types > because they just confuse people and make it necessary to read the > documentation: > > http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtkmm-tutorial/unstable/sec-intermediate-types.html.en > > So, for instance, Gtk::FileChooser::get_uris() would return a > std::list<> or std::vector instead of a Glib::SListhandle<>: > > http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtkmm/2.20/classGtk_1_1FileChooser.html#abe7450acc71c70b5f595f9e23224a24e > > I think people generally agree with me about this, but I'd like to hear > about any objections. > > Also, should we use std::list or std::vector? I suspect that std::vector > would be more useful. > > -- > [email protected] > www.murrayc.com > www.openismus.com > > _______________________________________________ > gtkmm-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list >
_______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
