On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 21:57 +0100, Chris Gordon-Smith wrote: > Thanks. This makes sense to me. I agree that Glib should eventually > drop its own threading implemention. As things stand now, the > requirement for GTKmm programmers to use Glib::Thread impedes the > adoption of the standard - std::thread.
Then this is something that someone should talk to the glib developers about. -- [email protected] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
