On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:19:08 +0200 Murray Cumming <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 21:57 +0100, Chris Gordon-Smith wrote: > > Thanks. This makes sense to me. I agree that Glib should eventually > > drop its own threading implemention. As things stand now, the > > requirement for GTKmm programmers to use Glib::Thread impedes the > > adoption of the standard - std::thread. > > Then this is something that someone should talk to the glib developers > about. Glib::Thread doesn't impede the use of std::thread or C threads, and it now appears that there is now no intention to do so (a great deal of code would be broken if that was attempted). It is an alternative.
Incidentally, is anything happening about bug #512348? Chris _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
