On Mon, 2012-07-16 at 00:50 +0300, ahmet öztürk wrote: > Kjell, thank you very much for the explanations. > > Actually, in vanilla tarball gtkspell-3.0 is used. When I try to compile > it in Ubuntu oneiric (11.10), it fails complaining that gtkspell-3.0 > could not be found > ( > https://launchpadlibrarian.net/110202120/buildlog_ubuntu-oneiric-amd64.lifeograph_0.9.0-1~ppa4~oneiric_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz > ). That's why I tried my luck with with gtkspell-2.0. (Although there is a > package with an uncanny name in the repos ( > http://packages.ubuntu.com/oneiric/libgtkspell3-0 ), obviously it cannot be > used by saying "pkg-config gtkspell-3.0".) > > OTOH, I tried to mix gtkmm-3.4 with gtkspell-2.0 and strangely enough > managed to build a binary without getting any warning although the > resulting binary could not be executed for the very reason you > mentioned. This level of "success" with gtkmm-3.4 makes me doubt that > gtkspell-2.0 is the cause behind RGBA errors.
Well, you cannot mix GTK+ 2 and GTK+ 3, so there's little point in investigating further until you've fixed that. -- Murray Cumming [email protected] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
