On a further note, it would be desirable if a build mixed of gtk+2 and gtk+3 would not even succeed in compilation (I know, gtk-devel.. I might actually investigate into that further).
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Murray Cumming <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2012-07-16 at 00:50 +0300, ahmet öztürk wrote: > > Kjell, thank you very much for the explanations. > > > > Actually, in vanilla tarball gtkspell-3.0 is used. When I try to compile > > it in Ubuntu oneiric (11.10), it fails complaining that gtkspell-3.0 > > could not be found > > ( > https://launchpadlibrarian.net/110202120/buildlog_ubuntu-oneiric-amd64.lifeograph_0.9.0-1~ppa4~oneiric_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz). > That's why I tried my luck with with gtkspell-2.0. (Although there is a > package with an uncanny name in the repos ( > http://packages.ubuntu.com/oneiric/libgtkspell3-0 ), obviously it cannot > be used by saying "pkg-config gtkspell-3.0".) > > > > OTOH, I tried to mix gtkmm-3.4 with gtkspell-2.0 and strangely enough > > managed to build a binary without getting any warning although the > > resulting binary could not be executed for the very reason you > > mentioned. This level of "success" with gtkmm-3.4 makes me doubt that > > gtkspell-2.0 is the cause behind RGBA errors. > > Well, you cannot mix GTK+ 2 and GTK+ 3, so there's little point in > investigating further until you've fixed that. > > -- > Murray Cumming > [email protected] > www.murrayc.com > www.openismus.com > > _______________________________________________ > gtkmm-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list > -- Everything is Original.
_______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
