On Tue, 2013-04-02 at 13:02 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > On Tue, 2013-04-02 at 02:53 -0400, José Alburquerque wrote: > > On Monday, April 1, 2013, Murray Cumming wrote: > > With glib 2.36, it looks like we might need to change how we > > allow gtkmm > > apps to derive/implement custom TreeModels and other > > interfaces: > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687659#c6 > > > > > > Maybe not. There may be a way to fix things to allow people to > > derive/implement the interfaces as they already do even if the glib > > developers decide to not allow adding interfaces after the class init > > function runs. I'll see if I can come up with a patch soon. > > > Thanks. That would be great. > > I have not actually released glibmm 2.36.0 yet, so it can still get into > the release if necessary.
glib now has a glibmm-specific workaround to fix this for us. I will release the .0 stable versions as soon as that is in a tarball version that we can depend on. We'll have to look at this again soon though because that workaround will be removed in the next glib development cycle: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=697229#c12 -- Murray Cumming [email protected] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
