2013/7/17 Murray Cumming <[email protected]>: > It looks like we have one more cycle (the current one) before they break > this in glib. So that means we have a little more time until we have to > do a parallel-installable ABI, or to find some new way around it.
If the decision is made to create a new parallel-installable ABI, please consider also making an ABI break in libsigc++ to fix several bugs. The worst bug is that disconnection of slots takes O(N) time and can lead to extremely bad performance: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=167714 Another possibility is replacing libsigc++ with a Boost library (Boost.Signals or Boost.Signals2). Regards, Krzysztof _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
