Uninteresting fluff.....

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rob Diesel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 7:50 PM
Subject: Flufff: Re: Re: Trip Report


> Wait? Isn't that the blue one?  It's proved to be slower than the (fast)
red
> one.
> Blue apparenly contains more colorpigments than red, hence it weighs more,
> not only that, but it also absorbs more light in all ranges, not only UV,
> which increases weight. Since light doesn't have a smooth surface, it also
> appears a little 'rough' in the wind, hence, it slows down the bike by
> increasing drag.
>
> Interesting stuff. :)
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Sowers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> > Mine is the fast '94.
> >

Reply via email to