On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 16:55:18 +0000, Jacob Appelbaum wrote: > > Given that TextSecure is now no better than WhatsApp (both do push > > messaging, both use phone numbers as identities, both use the axolotl > > ratchet, etc.), I don't really see a need to promote TextSecure over > > WhatsApp for casual (not-at-high-risk) encryption. SMSSecure, on the > > other hand, does something that WhatsApp, WeChat, etc., can't. > > TextSecure and Signal are Free Software.
TextSecure actually isn't. It uses Google Play Services, which is a non-free java library. It is required for sending the messages via Google and using their push service. Moreover, it won't work on devices without google apps. That is why SMSSecure is in F-Droid and TextSecure isn't, and I'm guessing that is why people refer to the former as the free software alternative. -- Daniel Martí - [email protected] - http://mvdan.cc/ PGP: A9DA 13CD F7A1 4ACD D3DE E530 F4CA FFDB 4348 041C _______________________________________________ List info: https://lists.mayfirst.org/mailman/listinfo/guardian-dev To unsubscribe, email: [email protected]
