On Mon, 23 Jun 1997, Randy Terbush wrote: <snip>
> Correct Mark. Whether it is a standalone server or an Apache module > is up for debate. I personally would like to keep it in the server > binary since it seems less problematic. It would be possible for > the server to spawn a separate config daemon at startup. This might > be an interesting application for a logging daemon as well. ok... this sounds logical and resonable.. Can assume that just about 95% or more of people who want a gui would be happy with a HTML interface? So if we did go with a API that is built into the daemon (spawned to a separate process on startup), Would we need a completely separate httpd running for the HTML interface? or could we build this HTML interface into the API daemon itself (the daemon is listening to API requests on one port and HTML on another)... -matt
