Then i think it must have been a misconfigured version of X-Windows SSH. I 
apologize. 
(But I still trust what i`ve seen with the guy`s next office - and we had SSH 
set up all over the department... I cannot tell, however, wether it was a 
backdoor, as Unix is not my responsibility and therefore I have not too much 
interest... I also think that I need to show this to the unix guys, but for my 
part I could as well say I have a prejudice against X - lets stop the 
discussion about X and get back to the GUI...) 


Anyway, I would strongly prefer the Java or TCL approach.

A nice feature would be to have multiple servers that all get the same update in
a single session, so you don`t have to connect them all and change the conf...
Or keeping a local copy of the conf`s in a database, so you can change them and 
let all the config changes be sheduled to take place during late hours or 4am 
sunday... Would also make it easier to set up a box after a diskcrash again...
(we are currently playing with the settings of some machines, because 
management wants this bit that way, and that bit this way - etc. You probably 
know the song)

and 3 times a week ?
well, i`ve changed the settings of the WinNT Apache we use in my department 5 
times this week already, always on demand by some guy who just NEEDs this 
feature.
I slowly see a change from order deny, allow to allow all in here :-)

SK


----- Begin Included Message -----

>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep  4 14:14 MET 1998
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 1998 08:16:35 -0400
From: Chris Wertman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone try ACE?
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

I use X on Win 95/NT all the time .....One Version is free , the Other SuperX 
is not , I use
SuperX , greatest favor you can do for your Windowz Box, I would use an X basd 
Config tool ,
especially as seldom as it would be used (3 times a week max) , But on the GUI 
side of things
why not some kinda Cross Platform GUI , I know there are CrossPlatform Tk's out 
there , whats
wrong with TCL or Java...? So it dosent matter what GUI they are Using X, Mac, 
Windowz,
etc...........When you say "a bit" have you EVER seen anyone comprimise X while 
running Under
SSH ???, I have not . And depending on how you set up SSH I would be hard 
pressed to belive
it possible if properly configured.


Chris Wertman

Stefan K�rner wrote:

> ----- Begin Included Message -----
>
> >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep  4 12:35 MET 1998
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1998 12:35:20 +0200 (MET DST)
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Anyone try ACE?
> X-Url: http://www.pvv.org/~borud/
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by sonne.darmstadt.gmd.de 
> id MAA06462
>
> [Stefan "K�rner"]
> |
> | X-Windows is a very bad idea for security reasons.
>
> it can be remedied a bit if you use ssh.
>
> -Bj�rn
>
> ----- End Included Message -----
>
> a bit, you said it...
> I`m still not satisfied with it - and hey, what about platforms :
> I can see no x-Windows on the Mac/WinNT/Win9x side...
> So it would be a platform specific solution again....
>
> Stefan Koerner
> (Using NT4, Suse 5.2 and Solaris 2.4 at this place)
>



----- End Included Message -----


Reply via email to