Rob Browning wrote:
Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


Those two things would benefit when Guile explicitely declares as a
external dependency.  The Right Thing for a Guile OS package such as a
.deb or .rpm is not to contain libltdl but to depend on the package
that contains libltdl.


For the record, now that we don't need customizations, I don't have
any problem with dropping our copy of libltdl.  Alhough I agree that
it would be good to have a clear configure error message when libltdl
is not detected.


That's my view too. Perhaps I'm spoilt by being a Debian user, but if other OS's don't have a decent package system, they really ought to sort that out.


        Neil



_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel

Reply via email to