Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What I would be happy with is to include a copy of libltdl in the > Guile distribution but to have it completely ignored by configure > and the Makefiles. When libltdl is not found in the system, a > message could be printed that instructs the user to install libltdl, > maybe by using the included sources.
Hmm. I wonder what the chance is that a user will be able to get hold of the Guile source, but not the libltdl source. Is it high enough to justify keeping a normally unused copy of libltdl in our tree? -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
