On Sun, 28 Oct 2007, Neil Jerram wrote:
Elf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
(i usually start people off with guile nowadays,
despite its non-r5 compliance, as the wizard book is still around r4 material.)
I hope you don't mind me emailing you in response to your r6rs post;
I'm one of the Guile developers.
I wondered if you could say more about the r5-non-compliance that you
perceive? I thought we had solved all r5 compliance issues by now.
(Last time I heard it claimed that Guile was not r5-compliant, I
followed it up, and it was to do with a couple of tests relying on the
order of evaluation of letrec initializers. But that is fixed now.)
Many thanks,
Neil
apologies. im slightly out of date with my guile versions (i last used guile
hardcore around 1.4/1.6) so my information is incorrect. guile is fully
r5 compliant now to the best of my knowledge. (scwm still uses 1.4.1, which
is why i still use 1.4.1) no offense intended.
-elf
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
