Hi Ludovic, Thanks so much for your comments! I'll try to address this stuff tonight. Stress-testing on NetBSD sounds good!
Thanks, Julian On Nov 28, 2007 1:23 PM, Ludovic Courtès <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Julian, > > Overall, the patch looks good to me and your explanations were helpful. > The caveat is that I'm not familiar with SRFI-18 and not too comfortable > with these parts of the pthread API that you're wrapping, so I may well > overlook a few things here and there. I think we'll have to stress-test > the thing on NetBSD since it's good a catching thread-related > programming errors. > > My comments below are mostly cosmetic. Once you're done with them, > could you please provide a ChangeLog entry? > > Then we'll need to update the doc of the core API, and also add > documentation of the SRFI module itself (the custom has been to somewhat > duplicate SRFIs in the manual so that we have all documentation in one > place). _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
