> It's a bit of pain that srfi-18 doesn't refer forward to srfi-34/35. > Obviously the exception system of srfi-18 is very _like_ that of > srfi-34/35, but srfi-18 doesn't say whether its exceptions have to be > implemented using srfi-34/35. > > I guess that doesn't actually matter, though. srfi-18 simply > requires its exception primitives to be implemented somehow. If it > works semantically for them to be implemented using srfi-34/35, I > think it would make good sense for us to do that.
Thanks for the explanation, Neil. I've currently got something more or less working with pass-thrus to SRFI-34 exceptions, using a stored continuation to prevent the exceptions from being re-thrown (as per SRFI-18, "Primitives and exceptions"). I'm hoping to have something for you guys soon -- I'm starting a new day job right now, though, so it might be a little while. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
