Hi, "Julian Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Now, we should do something about `cond-expand' and `require-extension'. >> For the former, we should probably look at the current value of >> `(read-options)', but that requires changing the implementation of >> `cond-expand'. For the latter, we can provide a dummy module that >> modifies `read-options' and re-export the needed procedures. >> >> Thoughts? > > Sorry, what's the context? Is it that those functions read characters > independent of the default reader? We want `cond-expand' (SRFI-0) and `require-extension' (SRFI-55) to be SRFI-88-aware if possible. See what I mean? Thanks, Ludo'.
