Hi, "Julian Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'll look at cond-expand and require-extension.
With that patch checked in, one can already do:
(require-extension (srfi 88))
and then:
(cond-expand (srfi-88 #t)
(else #f))
|=
#t
> And unless anyone objects, I'd like to take a stab at adding SRFI-89
> and SRFI-90.
Yes, that'd be nice!
Thanks,
Ludovic.
