Ludovic Courtès escreveu: >> You might construe that I would like to turn Guile development into >> LilyPond development. That is not necessarily the case, but I keep >> misunderstanding what people expect in this community. I am assuming >> that developers in general are interested in a more lively and more >> rapid evolution of Guile, but everytime I see habits and policies that >> seem contrary to that goal. > > How many people fix bugs reported to `bug-guile'? Believe me, spending > time doing this makes you feel reluctant to large unmotivated changes.
Good point. I've just added myself to that list. >> Then again, with all the back & forth porting of changes between 1.8 >> and head, it's difficult to tell what is in 1.8 and what is not. > > Surely you'll enjoy it: we have an old-fashioned tradition of updating > `NEWS' when changing something in a branch! :-) Well, yes, but we also have many commits that are identified as "Changes from Arch/CVS synchronization" and "merge from 1.8" I tend to look at development history with gitk. I realize these commits are from the CVS era, but it makes me loose track of what is happening where. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
