Hi, On Mon 08 Sep 2008 12:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> - Nobody has enough initiative to put a single strategic #ifdef in the >> code. > > To me, it looks like the "strategic #if 0" was a way of admitting that > we know our code is broken, we don't know why, and we don't want to > investigate that ATM but we might eventually do that if we have time. > So no, I didn't feel that happy with this. I was not happy with this either. >> - If someone finally does take initiative, it's only ok if it is >> perfect. It's great that you're working on this stuff! But it should have been pushed to a branch. The thing is, it really *does* need to be perfect. Maybe not at first push, but within a couple weeks of being merged to mainline. My fear was that since Guile hackers have so little time, in general, that you would push something broken in corner cases, then walk off -- not a concern specific to any one person. It's good that you are sticking around to iron out the bugs. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
