Hello Andy! "Andy Wingo" <wi...@pobox.com> writes:
> commit cee1d22c3c10b1892c82a5758ef69cd6fc9aba31 > Author: Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> > Date: Mon Feb 22 23:00:19 2010 +0100 > > actually capture partial continuations [...] > +#ifdef SCM_ALIGNED > +#define SCM_DECLARE_STATIC_ALIGNED_ARRAY(type, sym)\ > +static const type sym[] > +#define SCM_STATIC_ALIGNED_ARRAY(alignment, type, sym)\ > +static SCM_ALIGNED (alignment) const type sym[] > +#else > +#define SCM_DECLARE_STATIC_ALIGNED_ARRAY(type, sym)\ > +static type *sym > +#define SCM_STATIC_ALIGNED_ARRAY(alignment, type, sym) \ > +SCM_SNARF_INIT(sym = scm_malloc (sizeof(sym##__unaligned) + alignment - 1); \ ‘scm_gc_malloc_pointerless ()’ could be used here. It always returns 8-byte aligned areas [0], which should allow some of the alignment twiddling to be removed. What do you think? Also, the indentation, spacing, etc., are not GCS-conforming. Thanks, Ludo’. [0] http://www.hpl.hp.com/hosted/linux/mail-archives/gc/2006-May/001280.html
