Heya, On Mon 01 Mar 2010 17:33, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> "Andy Wingo" <wi...@pobox.com> writes: > >> commit cee1d22c3c10b1892c82a5758ef69cd6fc9aba31 >> Author: Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> >> Date: Mon Feb 22 23:00:19 2010 +0100 >> >> actually capture partial continuations > > [...] > >> +#ifdef SCM_ALIGNED >> +#define SCM_DECLARE_STATIC_ALIGNED_ARRAY(type, sym)\ >> +static const type sym[] >> +#define SCM_STATIC_ALIGNED_ARRAY(alignment, type, sym)\ >> +static SCM_ALIGNED (alignment) const type sym[] >> +#else >> +#define SCM_DECLARE_STATIC_ALIGNED_ARRAY(type, sym)\ >> +static type *sym >> +#define SCM_STATIC_ALIGNED_ARRAY(alignment, type, sym) \ >> +SCM_SNARF_INIT(sym = scm_malloc (sizeof(sym##__unaligned) + alignment - 1); >> \ > > ‘scm_gc_malloc_pointerless ()’ could be used here. It always returns > 8-byte aligned areas [0], which should allow some of the alignment > twiddling to be removed. What do you think? Done > Also, the indentation, spacing, etc., are not GCS-conforming. I tweaked it a little, but my instincts here are bad. If you still care, please commit a proper fix :) Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
