Hi, Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> writes:
> On Sun 28 Feb 2010 22:31, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: [...] >>> + (<dynref> fluid) >>> + (<dynset> fluid exp) >> >> At first sight ‘fluid-ref’ and ‘fluid-set’ would seem more natural names >> to me. What do you think? > > I had it like that before, but I did it this way to match dynwind and dynlet. But it deals with fluids, right? In what sense does it match dynwind and dynlet? Thanks, Ludo’.
