Hi, On Sat 17 Jul 2010 14:52, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> writes: > >> On Sun 28 Feb 2010 22:31, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > > [...] > >>>> + (<dynref> fluid) >>>> + (<dynset> fluid exp) >>> >>> At first sight ‘fluid-ref’ and ‘fluid-set’ would seem more natural names >>> to me. What do you think? >> >> I had it like that before, but I did it this way to match dynwind and dynlet. > > But it deals with fluids, right? In what sense does it match dynwind > and dynlet? It deals with dynamic extent. dynlet is with-fluids. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
