Actually... On Tue 20 Jul 2010 18:35, [email protected] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> $ guile --debug -c 'sdf' > Backtrace: > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > 170: 8 [catch #t #<catch-closure d5a660> ...] > In unknown file: > ?: 7 [catch-closure] > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > 62: 6 [call-with-prompt prompt0 ...] > In module/ice-9/eval.scm: > 389: 5 [eval # #] > In unknown file: > ?: 4 [eval-string "sdf" #<undefined>] > In module/ice-9/eval.scm: > 356: 3 [eval #<memoized sdf> ()] > In unknown file: > ?: 2 [memoize-variable-access! #<memoized sdf> #<directory (guile-user) > b60120>] > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > 115: 1 [#<procedure dd08c0 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:109:6 (thrown-k . args)> > unbound-variable ...] > In unknown file: > ?: 0 [catch-closure unbound-variable #f "Unbound variable: ~S" (sdf) #f] > > ERROR: In procedure catch-closure: > ERROR: Unbound variable: sdf What a terrible backtrace!!! A -- http://wingolog.org/
