From: Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com > >Hi, > >I was hacking on Dorodango today, in a script that happened to have a >Guile-style (define-module ...) block, and I was importing pieces of an >rnrs library. Then I needed to update the import set to provide what >was needed. In the middle of making a keyboard macro to add >#:use-module before the library names, I realized that `library' is >actually a lot better in this regard, in that you just have one `import' >block, and all the libraries are listed there without having a prefix on >each one. > >So what do you all think about: > > (define-module (foo) > #:import ((bar) > (only (baz) qux foo) > ...))
We once discussed having a plural #use-modules in this thread. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-user/2007-10/msg00002.html -Mike Gran
