Hi, Procrastinating :)
On Thu 28 Jul 2011 23:23, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> skribis: > >> So what do you all think about: >> >> (define-module (foo) >> #:import ((bar) >> (only (baz) qux foo) >> ...)) >> >> Or even: >> >> (define-module (foo) >> (import (bar) >> (only (baz) qux foo) >> ...)) > > I’d prefer #:use-modules (plural), for consistency: > > (define-module (foo) > #:use-modules ((bar) > (baz) #:select (qux foo) > (chbouib) #:renamer (symbol-prefix-proc 'p))) > > What do you think? I don't like the paren placement so much. Consistency is important, but TBH I think that we should phase out the "use-module" / "use-modules" terminology, in favor of "import" terminology of r6rs and the coming r7rs. What do you think about that? :-) Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
