Neil Jerram <n...@ossau.homelinux.net> writes: > Rob Browning <r...@defaultvalue.org> writes:
>> So do I understand correctly that in order for this to work, we'll first >> need an updated libgc in Debian unstable? > > Yes. Great. If we can get this and the s390 problem fixed, I'll be able to see about removing 1.8 from Debian testing (which I'd love to do soon -- I'd really like to drop 1.8 from the upcoming release). >> If so, I'll probably hold off on the guile patch for now. > > Sure. I'm happy that it's with me, for the moment, to propose something > coherent to the libgc maintainer. Could this also be related to the other current 2.0.5 arm(el|hf) failures: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=guile-2.0&suite=sid http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=10646 If it helps, I just tried debugging that problem on an armhf machine, and test-with-guile-module fails like this: Reading symbols from /home/rlb/guile/guile-2.0-2.0.3+1/test-suite/standalone/.libs/lt-test-with-guile-module...done. (gdb) run Starting program: /home/rlb/guile/guile-2.0-2.0.3+1/test-suite/standalone/.libs/lt-test-with-guile-module [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0xb6afa470 (LWP 11969)] Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0xb6afa470 (LWP 11969)] 0xb6eb512c in GC_malloc () from /usr/lib/libgc.so.1 (gdb) where #0 0xb6eb512c in GC_malloc () from /usr/lib/libgc.so.1 #1 0xb6f78f80 in scm_cell (cdr=2721088, car=383) at ../libguile/inline.h:117 #2 guilify_self_2 (parent=0x2976f0) at threads.c:580 #3 0xb6f79962 in scm_i_init_thread_for_guile (base=0xb6af9dc4, parent=0x2976f0) at threads.c:821 #4 0xb6f7999c in with_guile_and_parent (base=0xb6af9dc4, data=<optimized out>) at threads.c:865 #5 0xb6eb24ea in GC_call_with_stack_base () from /usr/lib/libgc.so.1 #6 0xb6f79ad8 in scm_i_with_guile_and_parent (parent=<optimized out>, data=0x0, func=0x87dd <thread_inner_main>) at threads.c:915 #7 scm_with_guile (func=0x87dd <thread_inner_main>, data=<optimized out>) at threads.c:921 #8 0x0000879c in thread_main (unused=<optimized out>) at test-with-guile-module.c:50 #9 0xb6deaee8 in start_thread (arg=0xb6afa470) at pthread_create.c:306 #10 0xb6d929e8 in ?? () at ../ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/nptl/../clone.S:116 from /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libc.so.6 #11 0xb6d929e8 in ?? () at ../ports/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arm/nptl/../clone.S:116 from /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libc.so.6 Backtrace stopped: previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?) (gdb) Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
